top of page
Search
Writer's pictureKen Lubin

Teamwork vs. Solo Sport: Insights on Leadership Styles from the Field



Whether you're in the boardroom or on the field, how you lead has a lot to do with the team around you. Leadership in sports teaches us a ton about different styles. Think of team sports versus solo sports: one demands coordination and connection, while the other calls for a focused, self-reliant approach. Understanding how leaders show up in these different settings can give you a fresh angle on adapting your own style to match what your team needs most.


Leading Like a Coach in Team Sports


In team sports, success depends on more than just individual talent. Everyone has a role, and each player’s effort matters. Coaches are there to make sure these roles connect and to build a sense of unity. In business, that’s the leader who understands that when people work together, they accomplish more. If you’re leading a team that thrives on collaboration, you’ll want to take a “coach” approach—making sure people know their role, how they fit in with others, and why their contributions matter.


Coach-like leaders are constantly connecting with team members, giving guidance and recognition, and keeping the whole group moving toward the same goal. They encourage open communication and emphasize that everyone is in it together. This approach doesn’t just help hit targets—it builds a culture of trust and accountability that keeps people motivated and invested in the team’s success.


Embracing a Solo Sport Mindset for Self-Driven Teams


On the other hand, solo sports are all about individual performance and resilience. Athletes in these sports push themselves to stay disciplined and overcome mental roadblocks because they rely solely on themselves. There are times in business when a hands-off approach is more effective, especially when managing highly skilled, self-motivated people. Instead of constant direction, these individuals may benefit more from the freedom to work independently, set their own goals, and drive themselves toward success.


For leaders, this means stepping back a bit. You become more of a facilitator, providing support and resources without hovering. This approach works well with teams that are experienced and self-sufficient—they know the expectations and are driven to reach them. As the leader, you’re there if they need help, but you give them the space to make decisions and navigate their own path.


Balancing Both Styles


The real challenge? Figuring out when to lean into each style. Some situations call for unity and collaboration, especially when facing big challenges that need a group effort. Other times, it’s more about letting people take ownership and run with it. It’s often a mix of both that drives the best results.


So, as you lead, keep an eye on what your team needs at the moment. When collaboration is essential, bring them together like a coach. When individual drive is key, let them take the lead like a solo athlete. Both approaches can bring out the best in your team—you just need to know when to switch gears.


Thanks for reading

Ken

26 views0 comments

Comentarios


bottom of page